Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Subclinical Mastitis in Smallholder Dairy Systems

Authors

  • Stanley N. Gathekia College of Veterinary Medicine, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kiambu, Kenya Author

Keywords:

Subclinical mastitis Dairy cattle Smallholder dairy farms California Mastitis Test (CMT) Somatic cell count

Abstract

Background: Subclinical mastitis [SCM] remains one of the most economically relevant diseases of dairy cattle on the global level, characterized by elevated somatic cell counts and impaired milk quality without any obvious clinical symptoms. It is a disproportionate burden on smallholder dairy producers who usually have no access to regular diagnostic testing and preventive veterinary care. Aim: To determine the prevalence of subclinical mastitis at both the cow and quarter levels, and to identify the key risk factors associated with its occurrence in smallholder dairy farms. Methods: The cross-sectional study was done on 320 dairy cows that were lactating in 64 smallholder farms. The screen at the quarter level was the California Mastitis Test [CMT]. Bacteriological culture and identification of milk samples in CMT-positive quarters was carried out. The measurements of the management practices were obtained using a structured questionnaire. To determine the significant risk factors, the Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Findings: Cow-level and quarter-level prevalence rates of SCM were 43.1 and 24.4% respectively. The front quarters were not as affected as the rear quarters. The most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus [31.4%], then coagulase-negative staphylococci [22.8%] and Streptococcus agalactiae [17.3%]. In the multivariable model, poor milking hygiene (OR = 4.92; 95% CI: 2.46–9.85), moderate milking hygiene (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.18–3.53), advanced parity (OR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.74–5.67), and absence of pre-milking teat disinfection (OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.29–3.13) were significantly associated with subclinical mastitis. Conclusion: It was found that the prevalence of subclinical mastitis was high among the smallholder dairy farms, which could be traced mainly to the management shortcomings that are rectifiable. The most effective control measures suggested are specific training in milking hygiene, frequent CMT screening, and more intensive use of dry-cow therapy.

 

References

1. Halasa T, Huijps K, Østerås O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Veterinary quarterly. 2007 Jan 1;29(1):18-31.

2. Ruegg PL. A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. Journal of dairy science. 2017 Dec 1;100(12):10381-97.

3. Schepers AJ, Lam TJ, Schukken YH, Wilmink JB, Hanekamp WJ. Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997 Aug 1;80(8):1833-40.

4. Dohoo IR, Meek AH. Somatic cell counts in bovine milk. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 1982 Apr;23(4):119.

5. Schalm OW, Noorlander DO. Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test.

6. Kivaria FM, Noordhuizen JP, Kapaga AM. Risk indicators associated with subclinical mastitis in smallholder dairy cows in Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2004 Aug;36(6):581-92.

7. Muehlhoff E, Bennett A, MacMahon D. Milk and dairy products in human nutrition Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013 [Internet]. 2018.

8. Viguier C, Arora S, Gilmartin N, Welbeck K, O’Kennedy R. Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives. Trends in biotechnology. 2009 Aug 1;27(8):486-93.

9. Mungube EO, Tenhagen BA, Regassa F, Kyule MN, Shiferaw Y, Kassa T, Baumann MP. Reduced milk production in udder quarters with subclinical mastitis and associated economic losses in crossbred dairy cows in Ethiopia. Tropical animal health and production. 2005 Sep;37(6):503-12.

10. Mekonnen SA, Koop G, Melkie ST, Getahun CD, Hogeveen H, Lam TJ. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and associated risk factors at cow and herd level in dairy farms in North-West Ethiopia. Preventive veterinary medicine. 2017 Sep 15; 145:23-31.

11. Swinkels JM, Hilkens A, Zoche-Golob V, Krömker V, Buddiger M, Jansen J, Lam TJ. Social influences on the duration of antibiotic treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 2015 Apr 1;98(4):2369-80.

12. Hogan JS, Gonzalez RN, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW, Smith KL. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. National Mastitis Council, Madison, WI. 1999;78(7):485-8.

13. Mekibib B, Furgasa M, Abunna F, Megersa B, Regassa A. Bovine mastitis: Prevalence, risk factors and major pathogens in dairy farms of Holeta Town, Central Ethiopia. Veterinary world. 2010;3(9):397-403.

14. Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwal MS. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: An overview. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 2011;24(3):429-38.

15. Bradley AJ. Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. The veterinary journal. 2002 Sep 1;164(2):116-28.

16. Jones GM, Pearson RE, Clabaugh GA, Heald CW. Relationships between somatic cell counts and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science. 1984 Aug 1;67(8):1823-31.

17. Taponen S, Pyörälä S. Coagulase-negative staphylococci as cause of bovine mastitis—Not so different from Staphylococcus aureus? Veterinary microbiology. 2009 Feb 16;134(1-2):29-36.

18. Sordillo LM, Streicher KL. Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia. 2002 Apr;7(2):135-46.

19. Almaw G, Zerihun A, Asfaw Y. Bovine mastitis and its association with selected risk factors in smallholder dairy farms in and around Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Tropical animal health and production. 2008 Aug;40(6):427-32.

20. Halasa T, Nielen M, De Roos AP, Van Hoorne R, de Jong G, Lam TJ, Van Werven T, Hogeveen H. Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day model. Journal of dairy science. 2009 Feb 1;92(2):599-606.

21. Neculai-Valeanu AS, Ariton AM. Udder health monitoring for prevention of bovine mastitis and improvement of milk quality. Bioengineering. 2022 Oct 23;9(11):608.

22. Sargeant JM, Leslie KE, Shirley JE, Pulkrabek BJ, Lim GH. Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. Journal of dairy science. 2001 Sep 1;84(9):2018-24.

23. Green MJ, Bradley AJ, Medley GF, Browne WJ. Cow, farm, and management factors during the dry period that determine the rate of clinical mastitis after calving. Journal of dairy science. 2007 Aug 1;90(8):3764-76.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Subclinical Mastitis in Smallholder Dairy Systems. (2025). Animal Health, 1(01), 01-10. https://ah.aieg.us/index.php/ojs/article/view/AH111

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.